6 Chipsets Similar to Kirin 8020
The Kirin 8020 targets the high-performance segment while staying efficient. This makes it suitable for Huawei’s mainstream phones that still want a flagship feel. It focuses on strong power and stable temperature. The interface feels responsive, while power consumption in daily use stays low.
The Kirin 8020 uses a 7 nm SMIC process. It may not be the newest, but its efficiency remains solid. This balance makes the Kirin 8020 feel just right. It performs fast in demanding moments and stays cool during lighter tasks.
The CPU has eight cores in a 1+3+4 setup. One main core reaches 2.29 GHz, three performance cores reach 2.05 GHz, and four efficiency cores run at 1.3 GHz. Its graphics unit comes from the Maleoon 920 family. This variant focuses on stability at medium settings, so gameplay stays smooth.
Based on circulating test results, the Kirin 8020 reaches 1,326,372 on AnTuTu v10. Its Geekbench 6 score is 1,350 for single-core and 3,570 for multi-core. So what chipsets sit close to the Kirin 8020 in real performance? Here is the list.
1. MediaTek Dimensity 9000+
The Dimensity 9000+ stands in the same class as the Kirin 8020. Both chipsets aim at the almost-flagship segment in the Android market.
The Dimensity 9000+ uses TSMC’s 4 nm process and is known for its stability under heavy workloads. The Kirin 8020 brings optimisation from Huawei’s top lineup, so the daily experience feels smooth and refined.
Synthetic tests show interesting results. The Dimensity 9000+ reaches about 1,114,121 on AnTuTu v10, while the Kirin 8020 surprisingly lands higher at 1,326,372. This wide gap usually comes from the Kirin 8020’s aggressive tuning across CPU, GPU, memory, and UX scores.
The story changes once we look at raw CPU strength. On Geekbench 6, the Dimensity 9000+ leads with 1,647 for single-core and 4,481 for multi-core. The Kirin 8020 scores 1,350 and 3,570.
This means tasks that rely on pure CPU power, such as data compression, heavy multitasking, or creative workloads, will run better on the Dimensity 9000+.
Phones that use the Dimensity 9000+ include ASUS ROG Phone 6D, ASUS ROG Phone 6D Ultimate, and OPPO Find N2 Flip.
2. Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 also sits close to the Kirin 8020. It often performs more efficiently when the phone handles long or demanding workloads.
This chipset uses TSMC’s refined 4 nm process. It is known for stable performance during long gaming sessions or heavy multitasking. The experience stays consistent without sudden drops.
On AnTuTu v10, the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 scores 1,299,948. This score reflects a balanced package across CPU, GPU, memory, and UX components. It usually sits slightly below the Kirin 8020 in total points. However, daily performance feels just as responsive.
Geekbench 6 tells a different story. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 scores 1,767 for single-core and 4,591 for multi-core. This headroom makes it stronger for tasks such as file compression, photo export, large spreadsheets, and other creative or productivity workloads.
The efficiency of TSMC helps control temperature and power draw when the chipset runs at full load. Phones powered by the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 include Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4, ASUS Zenfone 9, ASUS ROG Phone 6, Xiaomi 12T Pro, OnePlus 10T, iQOO 10 Pro, and realme GT Neo 5.
3. Google Tensor G3
The Google Tensor G3 delivers performance that is generally comparable to the Kirin 8020. This Google-made chipset uses Samsung’s 4 nm process (4LPP) and has a different focus compared to most competitors.
Tensor G3 does not aim for the highest synthetic scores. Its strength lies in on-device AI processing and everyday efficiency. This character shows up in its camera computation, language processing, and smart system features.
Tensor G3 reaches 1,151,520 on AnTuTu v10. On Geekbench 6, it scores 1,760 for single-core and 4,442 for multi-core.
These numbers place it slightly below the Kirin 8020 in general performance. For pure CPU tasks such as file compression or photo export, Tensor G3 can close the gap and sometimes surpass it.
For gaming, Tensor G3 performs well enough for medium to long sessions, although it is not the fastest option in its class. Its design leans toward stability and camera integration rather than extreme graphics output.
Its main strengths appear in computational photography and practical AI tools. Phones powered by the Tensor G3 include the Google Pixel 8, Pixel 8 Pro, and Pixel 8a.
4. Exynos 2200
The Exynos 2200 delivers a level of performance that aligns with the Kirin 8020. It is built on Samsung Foundry’s 4 nm process. The chipset performs strongly at the start of a heavy workload, then slows down when temperatures rise. The best results appear during moderate use or when the phone stays cool.
The Exynos 2200 records 1,137,188 on AnTuTu v10. This score places it slightly below the Kirin 8020. The interface still feels fast, although not as aggressive as Huawei’s tuning. On Geekbench 6, the Exynos 2200 reaches 1,582 for single-core and 3,669 for multi-core.
Both results come out higher than the Kirin 8020. Tasks that depend on CPU computing tend to run faster on the Exynos 2200, especially when workloads are not too prolonged.
For gaming, the Exynos 2200 can run popular titles at medium to high settings. Long sessions may lead to frame rate drops due to heat. More moderate graphics settings or a balanced mode usually provide steadier gameplay.
5. Kirin 9020
The Kirin 9020 is positioned above the Kirin 8020 in the same family. It still follows the same design but receives more aggressive tuning for stronger performance. This chipset stays on the 7 nm SMIC process, so its efficiency remains familiar, although its clock speeds are higher than the 8020.
The Kirin 9020 uses a 2+6+4 CPU setup, which means more performance cores and a higher frequency ceiling. The Kirin 8020 uses a 1+3+4 layout that is more conservative.
Both chipsets still rely on ARM-based architecture. Their daily performance feels similar, but the 9020 offers more power when applications run several threads at once. Both use the Maleoon GPU family, although the 9020 operates at a faster level.
In synthetic tests, the Kirin 9020 reaches 1,248,520 on AnTuTu v10. On Geekbench 6, it records 1,298 for single-core and 4,586 for multi-core. The multi-core improvement is quite clear compared to the 8020. Tasks such as compression, photo export, light rendering, and heavy multitasking tend to finish faster.
The Kirin 9020 fits users who often rely on the CPU for medium workloads. Its responsiveness stays strong, while the Kirin 8020 remains cooler and more efficient for everyday use.
The Kirin 9020 powers Huawei’s higher-end phones, such as the Huawei Mate 70 series, Huawei Pura 80 series, and the Huawei Mate XTs.
This also shows that the Huawei nova 14 Pro with the Kirin 8020 offers performance that approaches Huawei’s flagship devices, although the 9020 is still faster.
6. Snapdragon 7 Gen 4
The Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 is an upper mid-range chipset built on TSMC’s 4 nm process. It aims to balance performance and efficiency.
Its 1+4+3 CPU layout based on Cortex A720 and A520 cores delivers quick daily performance with good power savings. In real use, the performance level stays near the Kirin 8020, especially in tasks that use several threads.
On AnTuTu v10, the Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 posts 1,086,379. On Geekbench 6, it scores 1,204 for single-core and 3,592 for multi-core. Compared to the Kirin 8020, the total AnTuTu score is lower, the single-core result is lower, and the multi-core result is slightly higher.
In daily use, the interface feels snappy. Heavy applications that utilise multiple cores can run fast, and the 4 nm process helps maintain efficiency.
For gaming, the Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 can run popular titles at medium to high settings. The 4 nm process also helps maintain steady frame rates when the environment is not too hot. Users who multitask often, such as recording videos while chatting and checking maps, can expect smooth performance.
The chipsets in this discussion are all competitors in the Kirin 8020 class. They suit upper mid-range phones that aim for a flagship feel. Each chipset has its own strengths. The main point is that the Kirin 8020 delivers performance that can be compared to flagship phones from the past few years.