5 Chipsets Similar to Kirin T92

Huawei continues to push forward with the development of its own chipsets. One of its latest releases is the Kirin T92, designed to reduce reliance on external component suppliers. This new SoC powers the Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025), which is set to launch in February 2025.

There isn’t much detailed information available yet about the Kirin T92. However, according to a video from the YouTube channel Jagat Review, this chipset features an eight-core CPU, divided into three clusters.

The first cluster has one core running at 2.5 GHz. The second cluster contains three cores clocked at 2.15 GHz, while the third cluster includes four cores at 1.6 GHz. For graphics, the Kirin T92 is equipped with a Maleeon 920 GPU, which is estimated to run between 624 and 840 MHz.

A known leaker mentioned that the Kirin T92 uses Huawei’s own custom core architecture called Taishan. It's also said that the chip supports 12 threads, meaning some cores may be capable of handling more than one thread.

Other technical details, like the ISP or NPU, have not yet been revealed. However, it's confirmed that the chipset includes support for Bluetooth 5.2 and WiFi 6. Several sources report that the Kirin T92 is manufactured using SMIC’s 7nm process technology.

Based on data from the Huawei Central website, the Kirin T92 has an AnTuTu v10 score of 1,107,102. In Geekbench 6, it scored 1,175 for single-core and 4,017 for multi-core performance. Notebook Check also noted that the chipset achieved a 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited (Vulkan) score of 7,303.

DKID Media conducted a CPU throttling test, showing that the Kirin T92 maintained 86% of its peak performance throughout a 30-minute test session. Impressively, it never dropped below 80%, which suggests good thermal and performance stability.

However, note that not all benchmark results may be valid, as many reviewers report issues with testing. Some benchmark apps were unable to recognize the Kirin T92 hardware properly.

Despite the lack of complete information, the Kirin T92 performs well in real-world usage. According to Gizmochina, the Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025), powered by this chip, can run Genshin Impact smoothly on the highest settings at 60 fps, with the frame rate averaging around 59.3 fps.

Due to the limited official details, it's still challenging to categorize the Kirin T92 precisely. However, we'll try to identify five SoCs that are likely to offer similar performance levels.

This comparison should help you decide whether the Kirin T92 belongs in the mid-range, upper mid-range, or high-end segment. Curious to see which SoCs match its performance? Let's dive into the list.

1. Google Tensor G3

The Google Tensor SoC series is not primarily focused on gaming performance. Instead, Google designed this chipset to excel in AI-related tasks. With the release of the Google Tensor G3, the company began shifting toward more well-rounded performance to compete with other flagship-class SoCs.

Still, artificial intelligence and machine learning remain its main strengths. Launched in October 2023, the Tensor G3 features advanced AI capabilities that run directly on the device, without needing a server. This means all processing happens on the client side, which helps with speed and privacy.

You’ll find this SoC powering the Google Pixel 8, Pixel 8 Pro, and Pixel 8a. These phones support AI features such as Magic Editor (for removing objects in photos), Magic Audio Eraser (for eliminating background noise in recordings), Best Take (for adjusting facial expressions), and an AI-powered Recorder app that can generate automatic summaries.

The Tensor G3 has a nine-core CPU, consisting of one Cortex X3 core at 2.91 GHz, four Cortex A715 cores at 2.37 GHz, and four Cortex A510 cores at 1.7 GHz. Built using Samsung’s 4 nm process, the chip is paired with a Mali-G715 MP7 GPU that runs at up to 890 MHz.

In testing by GSM Arena, the Tensor G3 scored 1,151,243 on AnTuTu v10. On Geekbench 6, it scored 1,766 for single-core and 4,492 for multi-core performance. In the 3DMark Wild Life Vulkan 1.1 test, its GPU achieved a score of 8,476.

Pros of Google Tensor G3 over Kirin T92:

• Higher single-core and multi-core Geekbench scores (1,766 vs 1,175 and 4,492 vs 4,017)
• More advanced 4 nm manufacturing process (vs 7 nm)
• Slightly faster GPU (890 MHz vs 840 MHz)
• Higher AnTuTu score (1,151,243 vs 1,107,102)
• Better GPU performance in 3DMark (8,476 vs 7,303)

Cons of Google Tensor G3 compared to Kirin T92:

• The CPU tends to throttle under heavy workloads, which can reduce sustained performance

2. Dimensity 8300/8350

The Dimensity 8300 and 8350 are two MediaTek chipsets that share a very similar design. Because of their nearly identical structure and capabilities, they are often considered interchangeable in performance comparisons.

Both SoCs are built on a 4 nm process and have eight CPU cores split into three clusters. The first cluster contains one Cortex A715 core clocked at 3.35 GHz. The second cluster has three Cortex A715 cores at 3.2 GHz, while the third consists of four Cortex A510 cores running at 2.2 GHz.

These chipsets use the Mali-G615 MP6 GPU, which can reach up to 1,400 MHz. They also support LPDDR5X RAM with a peak bandwidth of 68.2 Gbit/s and UFS 4.0 storage.

For multimedia, the Dimensity 8300 features the MediaTek APU 780 ISP, which supports display resolutions up to 2960 x 1440 pixels and cameras up to 320 MP with 4K video recording at 60 fps.

For connectivity, these chipsets include a 5G modem with download speeds of up to 7,900 Mbps and upload speeds of up to 4,200 Mbps. However, they only support WiFi 6—not WiFi 6E or WiFi 7.

The Dimensity 8300 powers phones like the POCO X6 Pro 5G and Xiaomi 14T, while the Dimensity 8350 is found in the OPPO Reno 13 5G and Tecno Camon 40 Premier 5G.

In our review of the Xiaomi 14T, the Dimensity 8300 achieved an AnTuTu v10 score of 1,202,704. On Geekbench 6, it scored 1,280 in single-core and 3,935 in multi-core tests. According to Nano Review, its GPU reached 9,818 points on the 3DMark Wild Life Vulkan test.

Pros of Dimensity 8300/8350 over Kirin T92:

• Higher single-core score (1,280 vs 1,175)
• More efficient 4 nm process (vs 7 nm)
• Faster GPU (1,400 MHz vs 840 MHz)
• Higher AnTuTu score (1,202,704 vs 1,107,102)
• Stronger GPU performance in 3DMark (9,818 vs 7,303)
• Better app and game optimization due to wider developer support

Cons of Dimensity 8300/8350 compared to Kirin T92:

• Slightly lower multi-core performance (3,935 vs 4,017)
• Like the Tensor G3, this chipset is also more prone to throttling under prolonged heavy loads

3. Apple A14 Bionic

The Apple A14 Bionic is packed with advanced technology. Released in 2020, it was built using TSMC’s 5 nm fabrication process—an impressive feat at the time. This chipset was among the first to bring cutting-edge performance to mobile devices.

One of its main highlights is the 16-core Neural Engine, which significantly boosts AI and machine learning tasks. Apple claimed that its machine learning performance was 80% better than that of the A13 Bionic. The A14 also saw a 40% CPU improvement and a 30% GPU boost over the A12.

Alongside the Neural Engine, the A14 Bionic features a six-core CPU and a four-core GPU clocked at 1.278 MHz. It also includes an ISP capable of 4K video recording at 60 fps, support for WiFi and Bluetooth, and a built-in 5G modem.

The CPU is divided into two clusters: two high-performance cores (Firestorm) running at 3.1 GHz, and four efficiency cores (Icestorm) running at 1.8 GHz.

The A14 Bionic powers the iPad Air (2020) and all models in the iPhone 12 series—including the iPhone 12 Mini, iPhone 12, iPhone 12 Pro, and iPhone 12 Pro Max.

According to Nano Review, the Apple A14 scored 1,095,315 on AnTuTu v10. On Geekbench 6, it achieved 2,079 in single-core and 4,779 in multi-core tests. Its GPU scored 7,655 on the 3DMark Wild Life benchmark.

Please note that a direct comparison between the Apple A14 and Kirin T92 isn’t entirely fair, as they run on different operating systems. The comparison here is simply to gauge their approximate performance levels.

Pros of Apple A14 Bionic over Kirin T92:

• Higher CPU clock speed (3.1 GHz vs 2.5 GHz)
• Better Geekbench scores: single-core (2,079 vs 1,175) and multi-core (4,779 vs 4,017)
• More efficient manufacturing process (5 nm vs 7 nm)
• Higher 3DMark Wild Life score (7,655 vs 7,303)
• Greater developer support, ensuring better app and game optimization

Cons of Apple A14 Bionic Compared to Kirin T92:

• Lower AnTuTu v10 score (1,095,315 vs 1,107,102)

4. Exynos 1580

Samsung introduced the Exynos 1580 in October 2024, with its first appearance in the Galaxy A56, which launched in March 2025. The chipset was later included in the Galaxy Tab S10 FE and Tab S10 FE+.

The Exynos 1580 is Samsung’s first mid-range chipset to use AMD’s RDNA3 architecture. This design powers the Xclipse 540 GPU and helps improve overall GPU performance. The SoC is built using Samsung’s 4 nm process and integrates several important components.

On the CPU side, the chipset includes one Cortex A720 prime core (2.9 GHz), three Cortex A720 performance cores (2.6 GHz), and four Cortex A520 efficiency cores (1.95 GHz). Other components include a 14.7 TOPS NPU, a 200 MP-capable ISP, WiFi 6e and Bluetooth 5.4 support, and a 5G modem.

The Exynos 1580 also supports LPDDR5 RAM and UFS 3.1 storage. Compared to its predecessor, the Exynos 1480, this chip offers much-improved performance and energy efficiency, especially with a 37% improvement in GPU power efficiency.

In testing by GSM Arena, the Exynos 1580 achieved a score of 908,689 on AnTuTu v10. On Geekbench 6, it scored 1,364 in single-core and 3,899 in multi-core tests. Notebook Check reported a 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited score of 5,211.

Pros of Exynos 1580 over Kirin T92:

• Higher CPU clock speed (2.9 GHz vs 2.5 GHz)
• Faster GPU clock speed (1,300 MHz vs 840 MHz)
• Better single-core performance (1,364 vs 1,175)
• More efficient 4 nm process (vs 7 nm)

Cons of Exynos 1580 compared to Kirin T92:

• Lower multi-core score (3,899 vs 4,017)
• Lower 3DMark GPU performance (5,211 vs 7,303)
• Lower AnTuTu score (908,689 vs 1,107,102)

5. Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2

The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 is manufactured using TSMC’s 4 nm process and is based on the ARMv9-A architecture. Launched in March 2023, this chipset packs 10.2 billion transistors and operates with a thermal design power (TDP) of 6 watts.

Inside, it features an eight-core CPU setup: one powerful Cortex X2 core running at 2.91 GHz, three high-performance Cortex A710 cores at 2.49 GHz, and four power-efficient Cortex A510 cores at 1.8 GHz.

For graphics, the SoC includes the Adreno 725 GPU, clocked at 580 MHz with two execution units. Although the clock speed isn’t the highest, the Adreno 725 delivers strong performance thanks to its optimization and architecture.

The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 also comes with advanced features such as Snapdragon Elite Gaming for smoother, more detailed visuals, AI-powered resolution upscaling (from 1080p to 4K), a Triple 18-bit ISP supporting up to 200 MP cameras, and display support up to 3360 x 1600 pixels.

According to benchmark data from Nano Review, this SoC scored 1,124,140 on AnTuTu v10. On Geekbench 6, it achieved 1,697 points in single-core and 4,404 in multi-core tests. Meanwhile, its 3DMark Wild Life (Vulkan) score reached 7,530.

The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 is used in several mid-range smartphones, such as the POCO F5.

Pros of Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 over Kirin T92:

• Higher CPU clock speed (2.91 GHz vs 2.5 GHz)
• Better single-core and multi-core Geekbench scores (1,697 vs 1,175 and 4,404 vs 4,017)
• More efficient manufacturing process (4 nm TSMC vs 7 nm SMIC)
• Higher GPU performance (3DMark score of 7,530 vs 7,303)
• Slightly better AnTuTu v10 score (1,124,140 vs 1,107,102)
• Greater developer support for gaming and apps, leading to better optimization

Cons of Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 compared to Kirin T92:

• The CPU is more prone to throttling under prolonged load, with performance dropping to 70% in the first 30 minutes (compared to Kirin T92’s 80%)

Each of the five SoCs mentioned above comes with its own strengths and weaknesses. Most of them belong to either the flagship class or the upper mid-range category.

Based on performance and benchmarks, the Kirin T92 seems to sit somewhere between a high-end mid-range chip and an entry-level flagship. While it may lag behind in terms of clock speed and manufacturing technology, Huawei’s software and thermal optimization help maintain stable performance.

Hopefully, this comparison gives you a clearer picture of where the Kirin T92 stands among its competitors—and which SoC best suits your needs.