5 Chipsets Similar to UNISOC T7250

UNISOC might not always get the attention it deserves, especially when it comes to its mid-range and budget chipsets. But some of their chipsets are actually pretty good, and the UNISOC T7250 is one of them.

To be exact, the UNISOC T7250 is basically a rebranded version of the UNISOC T615 that's already on the market. It's aimed at the lower-midrange segment, where phones need to strike a good balance between performance and power-saving. And that’s exactly what this chipset tries to deliver.

The UNISOC T7250 is built using a 12 nm process and comes with eight CPU cores. It has two ARM Cortex-A75 cores running at 1.8 GHz for heavier tasks, and six Cortex-A55 cores at 1.6 GHz for lighter work.

For graphics, the T7250 uses a Mali G57 MC2 GPU running at 850 MHz. It also supports LPDDR4x RAM and storage options like eMMC 5.1 or UFS 2.2. In terms of network, it’s limited to 4G with download speeds up to 300 Mbps and upload speeds up to 150 Mbps.

When it comes to multimedia, the T7250 is actually not bad. It supports screens up to Full HD+ resolution. You can also enjoy a 120 Hz refresh rate, but only for HD+ screens. For cameras, it supports up to 108 MP and can record videos at 1080p 60 FPS.

Now, about the benchmark scores. So far, there are at least two phones powered by the UNISOC T7250 — the itel City 100 and the Redmi A5. For comparison, we’ll take the higher score.

According to tests by Legawa Gadget, the itel City 100 with the T7250 scored 306,511 points on AnTuTu v10. Meanwhile, when tested by Carisinyal, the Redmi A5 scored 264,784 points. On GeekBench 6, the chipset scored 439 points for single-core and 1471 points for multi-core performance.

So, how does it stack up against other chipsets? Well, our team has lined up five chipsets that are considered close to the T7250 in terms of performance.

Just a heads-up, they’re not exactly the same — but they are in the same ballpark. Here’s a look at five chipsets you can compare to the UNISOC T7250:

1. UNISOC T615

The first obvious competitor is the UNISOC T615 — basically the original version before it was rebranded into the T7250. Their architecture is very similar, so their performance isn't too different either.

The T615 is also made using a 12 nm process and has eight CPU cores: two Cortex-A75 cores (1.8 GHz) for performance and six Cortex-A55 cores (1.6 GHz) for efficiency. The GPU used is the Mali G57, also at 850 MHz.

For best performance, the T615 pairs well with LPDDR4x RAM at 1600 MHz. Storage options include eMMC 5.1 and UFS 2.2 — with UFS being faster.

Multimedia support is also good. The chipset can handle Full HD+ screens at a 90 Hz refresh rate or HD+ screens at 120 Hz.

For photography, it supports a New Generation ISP with three cores and a main camera resolution up to 108 MP, with 1080p 60 FPS video recording.

Phones that use the T615 include the itel P65, Tecno Pop 9, and Tecno Spark Go 1.

Based on Legawa Gadget’s tests, the itel P65 scored 308,681 points on AnTuTu v10. According to Nanoreview, the average score is around 263,913 points. On GeekBench 6, it scores about 441 points for single-core and 1,454 points for multi-core.

Here’s a quick comparison:

Pros of UNISOC T615 over T7250:

• Slightly higher AnTuTu v10 score (308,681 vs 306,511)
• Slightly better single-core performance (441 vs 439)

Cons of UNISOC T615 compared to T7250:

• Lower multi-core score (1454 vs 1471)

2. Helio G85

Another chipset that can be considered close to the UNISOC T7250 is the Helio G85. It’s built using a 12 nm process and runs on eight CPU cores.

The processor combines two Cortex-A75 cores running at 2 GHz for performance and six Cortex-A55 cores at 1.8 GHz for power-saving. For graphics, the Helio G85 uses the Mali G52 MP2 GPU, which runs at 1000 MHz.

To perform well, this chipset supports LPDDR4x RAM with speeds up to 1800 MHz. For storage, it’s compatible with either eMMC 5.1 or UFS 2.1. Like the UNISOC T7250, the Helio G85 is a 4G-only chipset, with download speeds of up to 300 Mbps and upload speeds up to 100 Mbps.

On the multimedia side, the Helio G85 uses an ISP powered by a Neural Engine. It supports screen resolutions up to Full HD+ (1080 x 2520 pixels), main cameras up to 48 MP, and video recording up to 2K at 30 fps.

According to Nanoreview, the Helio G85 scored an average of 262,804 points on AnTuTu v10. On GeekBench 6, it scored around 413 points for single-core and 1,332 points for multi-core. Its 3DMark Wild Life Performance score was 743.

Several phones run on this chipset, including the realme C65, POCO C65, Tecno Spark 20, Redmi 13C, and Infinix Note 30i.

Here’s a quick comparison between the Helio G85 and the UNISOC T7250:

Pros of Helio G85 over T7250:

• Higher CPU clock speed (2.0 GHz vs 1.8 GHz)
• Higher GPU frequency (1000 MHz vs 850 MHz)
• Higher maximum screen resolution
• Better video recording quality (2K vs 1080p)

Cons of Helio G85 compared to T7250:

• Lower AnTuTu v10 score (262,804 vs 306,511)
• Lower single-core and multi-core scores
• Lower upload speed (100 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
• Slightly lower camera resolution support

3. Snapdragon 685

The Snapdragon 685 from Qualcomm is another chipset that matches up pretty well against the UNISOC T7250. Built with a smaller 6 nm process, it’s more power-efficient while still packing solid performance with eight CPU cores.

This chipset is based on the ARMv8.2-A architecture. It has four Cortex-A73 cores at 2.8 GHz for high performance and four Cortex-A53 cores at 1.9 GHz for efficiency. For graphics, it relies on the Adreno 610 GPU, which runs at 1260 MHz.

The Snapdragon 685 also features a Qualcomm Spectra 12-bit ISP and a Hexagon 686 NPU. Thanks to this setup, it can support main cameras up to 108 MP and record videos at 1080p 60 FPS.

The display capabilities are also strong, supporting Full HD+ resolution with a refresh rate up to 120 Hz. For the best performance, this chipset pairs well with LPDDR4x RAM and UFS 2.2 storage.

Phones that use the Snapdragon 685 include the realme 13, Redmi Note 13, vivo Y200, Honor X8c, and realme C67.

Based on Nanoreview data, the Snapdragon 685 reaches an average AnTuTu v10 score of 349,440 points. On GeekBench 6, it averages 473 points for single-core and 1510 points for multi-core. Its 3DMark Wild Life Performance score stands at 641.

Here’s how it stacks up against the UNISOC T7250:

Pros of Snapdragon 685 over UNISOC T7250:

• Higher AnTuTu v10 score (349,440 vs 306,511)
• Higher single-core and multi-core scores
• Built using a smaller 6 nm process (vs 12 nm)
• Higher CPU clock speed (2.8 GHz vs 1.8 GHz)
• Higher GPU frequency (1260 MHz vs 850 MHz)
• Higher maximum screen resolution
• Faster download speeds (390 Mbps vs 300 Mbps)

4. Helio G91

Back to MediaTek, another chipset that’s close to the UNISOC T7250 is the Helio G91. It’s made with a 12 nm process and comes with eight CPU cores.

The setup is similar to others: two Cortex-A75 cores running at 2 GHz for performance and six Cortex-A55 cores at 1.8 GHz for power-saving. For graphics, the Helio G91 uses the Mali G52 MP2 GPU at 1000 MHz.

To get the best out of it, the Helio G91 works well with LPDDR4x RAM at 1800 MHz. It also supports storage types like eMMC 5.1 and UFS 2.1. Just like the T7250, this chipset only supports 4G networks, with download speeds of up to 300 Mbps and upload speeds of 100 Mbps.

For multimedia, the Helio G91 uses an ISP powered by a Neural Engine. It can handle Full HD+ screen resolutions (1080 x 2520 pixels), main cameras up to 108 MP, and record videos in 2K at 30 fps.

Several phones already use the Helio G91, including the Redmi 13, Tecno Spark 30, and POCO M6.

Based on Nanoreview data, the Helio G91 reaches an average AnTuTu v10 score of 276,628 points. On GeekBench 6, it scores around 429 points for single-core and 1389 points for multi-core.

Here’s a quick comparison between the Helio G91 and the UNISOC T7250:

Pros of Helio G91 over UNISOC T7250:

• Higher CPU clock speed (2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz)
• Higher GPU frequency (1000 MHz vs 850 MHz)
• Higher maximum screen resolution
• Better video recording (2K vs 1080p)

Cons of Helio G91 compared to UNISOC T7250:

• Lower average AnTuTu v10 score (276,628 points vs 306,511 points)
• Lower average single-core score (429 points vs 439 points)
• Lower average multi-core score (1389 points vs 1471 points)
• Lower upload speed (100 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)

5. UNISOC T620

Still from UNISOC, the T620 is another chipset that’s considered close to the T7250. It’s actually a successor to the UNISOC T618, but with slightly better performance, especially with a bit higher CPU clock speed.

The T620 is built with a 12 nm process and also uses eight CPU cores. It has two Cortex-A75 cores running at 2.2 GHz for heavier tasks and six Cortex-A55 cores at 1.8 GHz for lighter ones. For graphics, it uses the Mali G57 GPU at 850 MHz.

This chipset pairs well with 1600 MHz LPDDR4x RAM, and for storage, it supports both eMMC 5.1 and UFS 2.2 — with UFS offering faster speeds.

For multimedia, the T620 handles Full HD+ screens with a 90 Hz refresh rate or HD+ screens at 120 Hz. It also supports main cameras up to 108 MP and 1080p video recording at 60 FPS.

Interestingly, it seems UNISOC works closely with itel, because many itel phones use their chipsets. Right now, the itel S25 Ultra is one of the few (and maybe the only one so far) powered by the UNISOC T620.

According to benchmark tests by Jagat Review, the itel S25 Ultra scored 285,697 points on AnTuTu v9. On AnTuTu v10, it scored 302,909 points — though the GPU performance was a bit lower than expected. On GeekBench 6, the T620 scored 496 points for single-core and 1568 points for multi-core performance.

Here’s a comparison between the UNISOC T620 and the UNISOC T7250:

Pros of UNISOC T620 over UNISOC T7250:

• Higher single-core score (496 vs 439)
• Higher multi-core score (1568 vs 1471)
• Slightly higher CPU clock speed (2.2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz)

Cons of UNISOC T620 compared to UNISOC T7250:

• Slightly lower AnTuTu v10 score (302,909 vs 306,511)

So, those are the five chipsets that can be considered close or comparable to the UNISOC T7250. Each one has its own strengths and weaknesses, depending on what you need.

But remember, a smartphone’s quality isn’t just about the chipset. There are many other things — like software optimization, camera quality, battery life, and design — that also matter a lot.

In your opinion, which chipset do you think matches the UNISOC T7250 the most?